2008

As the oral argument in the Winter v. NRDC case looms, commentators are increasingly identifying this case as THE environmental case to watch for this Term. 

Check it out at:

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-scotus28-2008sep28,0,3657575.story

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jun/24/nation/na-scotus24

Stay tuned for more updates.  The brief we filed on behalf of nine retired Admirals, the Navy League and other civic organizations (as well

The State of Hawaii filed its Brief in Opposition to UFO Chuting's Petition for Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court.  The brief is here

The State's argument is several:  first, that UFO Chuting's argument regarding the Marine Mammal Protection Act was not presented to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (and therefore the Supreme Court

The Ecological Society of America filed an amicus, or friend of the court, brief in support of NRDC in the Winter v. NRDC case pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.  Its brief is here.

The Ecological Society of America’s arguments are three-fold: 

I. Scientific evidence supports the injunction. The peer-reviewed, published literature has led

A recently enacted law in Hawaii is sure to cause some confusion and commotion because of its unintended consequences.

This summer, a law was passed that requires a fee to be paid on freight brought into the state.  The Legislature passed the law, the Governor vetoed and the Legislature overrode the veto.  The fee is

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the Coast Guard's security zone for the Superferry (posted earlier here ).  In Wong v. Bush (opinion available here), the Ninth Circuit upheld the Coast Guard's security zone created to protect the Superferry in Nawiliwili Harbor on Kauai.

Several Superferry protestors challenged the Coast Guard's security zone

The U.S. Navy was just sued in federal court in Washington for alleged violations of the National Environmental Policy Act, Marine Mammals Protection Act, the Endangered Species Act and the Administrative Procedures Act.  The complaint is available here.

Plaintiffs, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY and the WILD FISH CONSERVANCY allege: 

 

 

Plaintiffs bring this action for declaratory and injunctive relief to require the Navy to comply with NEPA, and to enjoin the Navy from continuing to engage in Explosive Ordnance Disposal (“EOD”) training operations in Puget Sound until it comes into compliance with NEPA by producing adequate environmental reviews and/or institutes mitigation measures to sufficiently reduce or eliminate the environmental impacts of its EOD training operations. NEPA requires a federal agency to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) for all “major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment,” prior to undertaking such actions. 42 U.S.C. § 4332(C).

The lawsuit pends in the Western District of Washington.