As the oral argument in the Winter v. NRDC case looms, commentators are increasingly identifying this case as THE environmental case to watch for this Term.
Check it out at:
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-scotus28-2008sep28,0,3657575.story
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jun/24/nation/na-scotus24
Stay tuned for more updates. The brief we filed on behalf of nine retired Admirals, the Navy League and other civic organizations (as well
The final amicus briefs in the Winter v. NRDC case were filed and are available:
Two California legislators filed a brief supporting NRDC outlining their concerns about the impact to the State of California, available here.
Several conservation organizations filed another brief supporting NRDC arguing the merits of the injunction, available here.
And
The State of Hawaii filed its Brief in Opposition to UFO Chuting's Petition for Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. The brief is here.
The State's argument is several: first, that UFO Chuting's argument regarding the Marine Mammal Protection Act was not presented to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (and therefore the Supreme Court
The Ecological Society of America filed an amicus, or friend of the court, brief in support of NRDC in the Winter v. NRDC case pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. Its brief is here.
The Ecological Society of America’s arguments are three-fold:
I. Scientific evidence supports the injunction. The peer-reviewed, published literature has led
A recently enacted law in Hawaii is sure to cause some confusion and commotion because of its unintended consequences.
This summer, a law was passed that requires a fee to be paid on freight brought into the state. The Legislature passed the law, the Governor vetoed and the Legislature overrode the veto. The fee is
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the Coast Guard's security zone for the Superferry (posted earlier here ). In Wong v. Bush (opinion available here), the Ninth Circuit upheld the Coast Guard's security zone created to protect the Superferry in Nawiliwili Harbor on Kauai.
Several Superferry protestors challenged the Coast Guard's security zone
The U.S. Navy was just sued in federal court in Washington for alleged violations of the National Environmental Policy Act, Marine Mammals Protection Act, the Endangered Species Act and the Administrative Procedures Act. The complaint is available here.
Plaintiffs, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY and the WILD FISH CONSERVANCY allege:
Plaintiffs bring this action for declaratory and injunctive relief to require the Navy to comply with NEPA, and to enjoin the Navy from continuing to engage in Explosive Ordnance Disposal (“EOD”) training operations in Puget Sound until it comes into compliance with NEPA by producing adequate environmental reviews and/or institutes mitigation measures to sufficiently reduce or eliminate the environmental impacts of its EOD training operations. NEPA requires a federal agency to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) for all “major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment,” prior to undertaking such actions. 42 U.S.C. § 4332(C).
The lawsuit pends in the Western District of Washington.
Today, on behalf of the U.S. Navy League – Honolulu Council, nine retired Navy Admirals, naval warfare experts, and other civic organizations, we filed an amicus brief in support of the U.S. Navy in the Winter v. NRDC case pending at the U.S. Supreme Court. The brief is here.
We represent several major civic