Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the Roberts v. Sea-Land Services case.  The transcript of oral arguments is here

The issue in this case is when an injured longshore worker’s “Average Weekly Wage” is to be determined:  at the time of the entitlement to an award of compensation or the actual

Supplementing my earlier post on the Roberts v. Sea-Land Services, Inc. case, I have obtained copies of the cert-phase briefs from Claimant’s counsel.

Claimant’s Petition

U.S. Brief in Opposition

Claimant’s Reply

The Claimant sought review on the following Questions Presented:

The Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-50 (“Longshore Act”) provides generally

New Longshore case from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. It involves the exclusivity of the compensation scheme nestled in the Longshore and Harbor Worker’s Compensation Act.  the case is Langfitt v. Federal Marine Terminals, Inc., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15658 and can be found here.

Facts are simple:  longshore worker is injured