The Supreme Court has decided the “vessel” case. More to follow, but the opinion is available at http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-626
Criticism of the Jones Act – Natural Disasters
Ah, the Jones Act.In the wake of Hurricane Sandy, the President waived the Jones Act provisions barring foreign built tankers from carrying cargo between U.S. ports.Is it a "statutory relic" which is outdated and counter-productive? Does it cause consumer prices to increase, unfairly hitting remote communities like Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico? Should it…
Hawaii Supreme Court Reviews Contractor Licensing Law – Amicus Brief Filed
Cross-posted from Anna H. Oshiro's construction law blog and Robert H. Thomas' property law blog:
This case involves contractors' licensing and whether the holder of a specialty renovation license is entitled to do certain specialty renovation work as "incidental and supplemental" to that license. The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeal ruled in favor of…
Senate Vacancies, And Why Governors Must Pick Temporary Appointees Chosen By Political Parties
Earlier, we wrote about what Hawaii law requires whenone of its U.S. Senate seats becomes vacant. But how did Hawaii'sstatute — a minority rule, but not a complete outlier — come to be?And is a rule that cabins a governor's discretion by limiting the picksfor a temporary appointee to those selected by a political party…
News Flash – Renewable Energy Tax Credit Rule Change and Litigation
The State of Hawaii changed the rules pertaining to tax credits for renewable energy systems. We’ve prepared a quick news-blast. Relatedly, the Sierra Club recently filed suit to declare these rule changes void, here.
Damon Key Legal Alert: Hawaii Renewable Energy Technologies Income Tax Credits (Dec. 2012)
Replacing an Icon – Hawaii’s Process for Filling a U.S. Senate Vacancy
Re-posting from www.inversecondemnation.com.Hawaii's senior U.S. Senator, Daniel K. Inouye died today. We can't add much to the remembrances pouring in about this war hero, trailblazer, and political icon, so we'll just address what we know, the law regarding how the vacancy in the U.S. Senate will be filled. Mark Murakami and I did…
New Maritime Contracts Case from 2nd Circuit – Garanti Finansal Kiralama v. Aqua Marine
Interesting case noting the interplay between the Declaratory Judgment Act and the federal courts' admiralty jurisdiction. The case is Garanti Finansal Kiralama A.S. v. Aqua Marine and Trading, Inc. and the original opinion can be found here.Facts are straightforward: a marine shipping fuel provider brought a claim in arbitration demanding to be paid for…
New Defense Base Act Case from First Circuit – Truczinskas v. OWCP
As Amended. Often seen in statutes. Rarely litigated.The First Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decieion in a Defense Base Act case. It is entitled Truczinskas v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs and can be found here. The facts are short. A employee duing military training in Saudi Arabia was found hanging from…
Thinking Out Loud: Property Rights After Natural Disasters
I am pleased to announce that the Condemnation Committee of the American Bar Association's Section on Litigation is presenting a teleconference "roundtable" on the timely subject of natural disasters and property rights.The talk is entitled "Thinking Out Loud: Property Rights After Natural Disasters". Register here.A synopsis:
Over one-half of the people in the United…
Seventh Circuit Affirms Right to Bear Arms Outside of Home
Judge Richard Posner, writing for the majority on a Seventh Circuit panel, struck down Illinois’ ban on firearms possession outside the home as unconstitutional under the 2nd Amendment. The decision stays its impact for 180 days to allow the Illinois’ legislature time to “fix” the law.The opinion can be downloaded here.Much to read with the opinion largely based on historical analysis of carriage of firearms in the 18th century and on empirical studies about gun related crimes in America.We are disinclined to engage in another round of historical analysis to determine whether eighteenth-century America understood the Second Amendment to include a right to bear guns outside the home. The Supreme Court has decided that the amendment confers a right to bear arms for self-defense, which is as important outside the home as inside. The theoretical and empirical evidence (which overall is inconclusive) is consistent with concluding that a right to carry firearms in public may promote self-defense. Illinois had to provide us with more than merely a rational basis for believing that its uniquely sweeping ban is justified by an increase in public safety. It has failed to meet this burden. The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Second Amendment therefore compels us to reverse the decisions in the two cases before us and remandStay tuned.